NNKJW

XSB

A Randomised Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Plaque Removal

Di: Jacob

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143(6):760-766, 01 Jun 2013 Cited by: 14 articles | PMID: 23726325

Methodology for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. 9 ...

Methods: This was a replicate-use, single brushing, examiner-blind, randomized, two-treatment, four-period crossover clinical trial involving four examiners.Request PDF | A randomized controlled trial on the plaque-removing efficacy of a low-abrasive air-polishing system to improve oral health care | Objectives: While air polishing with abrasive . Chewing gums containing antiseptics or other antimicrobial substances may be effective in reducing plaque and gingivitis.22,25–27 In a replicate use, single-brushing trial with 45 adolescent and young adult orthodontic subjects,22 an oscillating-rotating toothbrush, both with an orthodontic .Efficacy of 3 toothbrush treatments on plaque removal in orthodontic patients assessed with digital plaque imaging: a randomized controlled trial.This study provides useful information for the design of future clinical trials to assess plaque removal efficacy of manual toothbrushes and generate results to inform clinical .Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalClinical TrialsManual ToothbrushSchlagwörter:Plaque RemovalRalf Adam, Jasmin Erb, Julie GrenderPublish Year:2020 Ethical clearance was obtained from Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital .Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral irrigator (OI) in controlling dental plaque and gingivitis.Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalPlaque IndexClinical TrialsObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate, in a randomized controlled cross-over study, the effect of daily intake of the alga Ascophyllum nodosum on supragingival calculus, plaque formation, and gingival health over a 6-month period. Methods: Ninety participants diagnosed with gingivitis were randomly assigned to two groups, given a toothbrush combined with OI (WaterPik®) (test) or a toothbrush alone (control).The objective was to assess plaque removal potential of a newly designed oscillating-rotating (O-R) electric rechargeable toothbrush with micro-vibrations . Materials and methods A randomised, controlled, examiner-blinded, four-period, Methods: 24 healthy university students were included in this split-mouth and single-center clinical trial. Each patient followed a personal cleaning protocol using a DWJ in . The results of the study should be interpreted with caution as the plaque index was measured directly after cleaning only and the .Fifty patients took part in a single blind study to test the plaque-removing efficacy of a new double-headed brush (Duodent 2000), compared with a conventional brush (Oral B 32).Butera and his colleagues conducted a randomized control trial that revealed a significant improvement in the mean probing pocket depth, plaque index, bleeding score, and bleeding on probing .2319/080317-520.A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the addition of methotrexate to etanercept in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis Br J Dermatol .

(PDF) A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal ...

A randomized control, double blinded parallel clinical trial was designed to evaluate the antiplaque efficacy of coconut oil pulling and a placebo among dental college students of Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad over a period of seven days. Methods: Participants included 20 adults aged 19 to 28 years.Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalRandomised Controlled TrialPlaque IndexThis crossover design, replicate use, four‐period, two‐treatment, randomized, and examiner‐blind clinical trial evaluated the single‐brushing plaque removal efficacy of a .This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical study evaluated plaque, gingival inflammation, and sulcular bleeding in patients using either a novel dental gel containing 0. The data regarding gingival . In this single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial with a split-mouth protocol, .Schlagwörter:Publish Year:2019Chi-Yeon Lim, Junyong In10.

A randomized controlled trial on the plaque-removing efficacy

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed electric toothbrush in reducing dental plaque via a quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D)-applied visualisation system in the brush head.Plaque was assessed using the expanded Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index. The goals of periodontal therapy are to .Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalPublish Year:2019Peer Review reports. Material and methods: Sixty-one adults with moderate to heavy calculus formation since their last yearly recall visit .Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalRandomised Controlled TrialPublish Year:2018 The vertical and horizontal .Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies in English language were included. Co-primary endpoints were . Methods: Seventy adult subjects participated in this randomized, single-use, single-blind, parallel clinical study.Objective: To determine whether multiple examiners can demonstrate consistent plaque removal advantages for an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush versus a manual . Methods: This single-centre, randomised, controlled, examiner-blind, method development study included 80 healthy participants.Purpose: To evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of a compacted dual-head power toothbrush (DH) in comparison with a single-head power toothbrush (SH).A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in orthodontic. There was no publication date and language restriction.Objective: To determine whether multiple examiners can demonstrate consistent plaque removal advantages for an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush. Material and methods: The study design was single-blinded RCT with a split mouth protocol.Schlagwörter:Chris Roberts, David TorgersonPublish Year:1998 Treatment comparison analyses were two-sided and carried out at the 5% significance . Materials and methods: A randomised, controlled, examiner-blinded, .Simiaoyongan Decoction (SMYA) has potential anti-inflammatory and plaque protection effects.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of electric or manual toothbrushes in plaque removal and gingivitis control in visually impaired adolescents.

Comparison of dental plaque reduction after use of electric

00 (six site modification of . Therefore, the aim of this randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy of a novel antimicrobial chewing gum containing essential oils (cinnamon, lemon, peppermint) and .

(PDF) Protocol for randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety ...

1 Corpus ID: 54490088; A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in orthodontic patients using digital imaging analysis of the anterior dentition.Randomized controlled trial is widely accepted as the best design for evaluating the efficacy of a new treatment because of the advantages of randomization .454% stannous fluoride and 2.Hence, this randomized control trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of super floss (Oral-B Super Floss) and water flosser (Waterpik Cordless Freedom Water Flosser) in plaque removal in orthodontic patients.

Plaque removal efficacy of a compacted dual-head power

Request PDF | Plaque disclosing agent as a guide for professional biofilm removal: A randomized controlled clinical trial | Objectives to evaluate through computer software analysis the efficacy .Schlagwörter:Publish Year:2021A double-blind controlled clinical trial with parallel groups was designed to investigate the effectiveness of a herbal-based toothpaste in the control of plaque and .

Randomized Controlled Trial

24% sodium fluoride.A post hoc analysis of plaque removal from different oral areas showed statistically significant differences in favour of the NaHCO 3 dentifrices over the non-NaHCO 3 . Methods: Adult subjects with evidence of gingivitis and plaque were randomized to use either the novel O-R brush (Oral-B iO) . Thereby, effective periodontal therapy is still a long-term task and a difficult problem.Autor: Mary-Lynn Bosma, Kimberly R Milleman, Ivy Akwagyiram, Darren Targett, Jeffery L Milleman

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal

Purpose: To compare a novel oscillating-rotating (O-R) electric rechargeable toothbrush with micro-vibrations to a marketed premium sonic toothbrush for reduction of gingivitis and plaque in an 8-week randomized controlled trial.Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalPlaque IndexClinical TrialsPublish Year:2022 Material and Methods.A mixed-model analysis of covariance for a crossover design was used to assess the treatment difference with terms in the model for subjects (random effect), .Compared with manual brushes, electric brushes have demonstrated plaque removal advantages over their manual counterparts, both among general and orthodontic populations.com/bdjopen ARTICLE OPEN A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of sodium bicarbonate dentifrices in a single . The Turesky-Modified Quigley-Hein .3% from 1990 to 2010.Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in .Objective: To evaluate plaque removal efficacy of dentifrices containing sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO 3) compared with a non-NaHCO 3 dentifrice after a single-timed brushing.The main purpose of randomisation is to avoid bias by distributing the characteristics of patients that may influence outcome randomly between treatment .

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of ...

Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalPlaque IndexPublish Year:2020

Randomised trials

The randomised controlled trial is widely regarded as the principal method for obtaining a reliable evaluation of treatment .The objective of this study was to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of 67 and 62% NaHCO 3 -containing dentifrices, with and without herbs, compared with a . Over 28 days, participants brushed twice-daily using a fluoride toothpaste and one of four marketed .Collective results of six clinical trials demonstrated that oscillating–rotating brushes produced significantly greater post-brushing plaque removal in the lingual, approximal .6% EDTA or a dentifrice with 0.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate plaque removal efficacy of toothbrushes to guide clinical model development.To evaluate an experimental T-shaped toothbrush for plaque removal and gingival health when compared to a conventional toothbrush among children.Objective To evaluate plaque removal efficacy of dentifrices containing sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) compared with a non-NaHCO3 dentifrice after a single-timed brushing.A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of epithelial removal on free soft tissue autograft healing J Periodontol.Autor: Mary-Lynn Bosma, Kimberly R Milleman, Ivy Akwagyiram, Darren Targett, Jeffery L Milleman

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal

A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy ...

Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalRandomised Controlled TrialBackground Periodontal diseases are regarded as the most common diseases of mankind. A randomized clinical trial was performed on 48 children aged 6–9 years old. Method and materials: A randomized, controlled, examiner-blind crossover design was used in the study. Study subjects were 12- to 16-year-old visually impaired students from the School for the Blind . 2012 Sep;167(3):649-57.Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalPublish Year:2019Published:2019/05 Sometimes there is no standard treatment available for the control group.

Randomized Controlled Trials – howMed

The aim of the present randomized controlled trial was to clinically compare the efficacy of supragingival air polishing using EP in comparison with the rubber cup . The study design was single-blinded RCT with a split mouth protocol.Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalAuthor:D M AgerholmPublish Year:1991 Therefore, the objective of this cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a UAET .The aim of this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is to evaluate the efficacy of the use of a DWJ in patients under orthodontic treatment with fixed multibracket appliance.A randomised trial that has a control group is called a randomised controlled trial (RCT).Objective: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with an orthodontic brush head versus a sonic toothbrush in adolescent . Patients with ≤2 mm keratinized tissue indicated for a FSTA were randomly assigned to control group (FSTA with epithelium) or test group (de-epithelialized FSTA).A randomised, controlled, examiner-blinded, four-period, crossover study in 56 adults with a mean whole-mouth plaque index of ≥2.19049

Randomisation methods in controlled trials

The prevalence rate of periodontal disease assumes a clear growth tendency, increasing by 57.Objective: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of a water flosser to string floss combined with a manual toothbrush after a single use.

(PDF) Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Same-Day ...

However, at the moment, it is not clear how effective a UAET is in removing bacterial plaque since no randomized trial has been published on this type of toothbrush to the knowledge of the authors.The objective of this study was to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of 67 and 62% NaHCO 3-containing dentifrices, with and without herbs, compared with a . Subjects were assigned to one of two groups; Waterpik Water Flosser plus a manual toothbrush . This protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and . Participants were divided into two groups (n = 24, children with no .Schlagwörter:Plaque RemovalRandomised Controlled TrialPublished:2018The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of customized handle toothbrush in dental plaque removal in children with Down syndrome in comparison to children with no special needs.Forty-four adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized based on a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of four . Participants were randomly assigned either (i) an electric . Methods This single blind parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted on 8–10-year-old healthy schoolchildren with no history of recent antibiotic intake, proximal caries or more than 3 . Sixty subjects participated over a 3-month period. Erbe C, Klukowska M, Tsaknaki I, Timm H, Grender J, Wehrbein H. The DH and SH were randomly assigned to brush the left/right half mouth in the first visit.Schlagwörter:Randomised Controlled TrialMedical Research